Resisting Scientific Realism, by K. Brad Wray: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018, Pp. xii + 224 [Book Review]

Philosophia 48 (2):861-866 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11406-019-00104-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resisting Scientific Realism by K. Brad Wray. [REVIEW]Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2019 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science Review of Books 1.
Resisting Scientific Realism. By K. Brad Wray.Glenn Statile - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2):237-239.
Resisting Scientific Realism.K. Brad Wray - 2018 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
A Critical Introduction to Scientific Realism, by Paul Dicken : London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016, pp. vii + 214, £28.99. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):205-206.
The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):393-407.
A new twist to the No Miracles Argument for the success of science.K. Brad Wray - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:86-89.
Explaining Science's Success, by John Wright: Understanding How Scientific Knowledge Works, Durham: Acumen, 2013, pp. 256, £40.00. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):833-834.
Which Groups Have Scientific Knowledge? Wray Vs. Rolin.Chris Dragos - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (5-6):611-623.
Pessimistic Inductions: Four Varieties.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):61-73.
Shapin's the scientific revolution: What will philosophers find? [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 1999 - Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):331 – 335.
Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - In Kuhn’s Social Epistemology and the Sociology of Science. Cham: Springer Verlag.
Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology.K. Brad Wray - 2011 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Another great 19th century creation: The scientific journal.K. Brad Wray - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 75:62-64.
The methodological defense of realism scrutinized.K. Brad Wray - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:74-79.
Robert J. Richards and Lorraine Daston, eds., Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 202 pp., $25.00 ; $75.00. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (1):184-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-18

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elay Shech
Auburn University

Citations of this work

Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy.Elay Shech - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):221-241.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.P. D. Magnus & Craig Callender - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (3):320-338.
Form-driven vs. content-driven arguments for realism.Juha Saatsi - 2009 - In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Form vs. Content-driven Arguments for Realism.Juha Saatsi - 2009 - In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Add more references