Van Inwagen’s Two Failed Arguments for the Belief in Freedom

Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):43-50 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview20102616

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Van Inwagen’s Two Failed Arguments for the Belief in Freedom.Zachary J. Goldberg - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):43-50.
Two Arguments From Incongruent Counterparts.Lori Murray - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):163-169.
Transgressive Freedom.Martina Ferrari - 2016 - Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1):93-104.
Freedom as Responsibility.Kenneth Henley - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (2):47-52.
Freedom and Power.Ramon M. Lemos - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):11-24.
Knowledgeable Belief.Richard Cole - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):89-94.
Religious Belief and the Will. [REVIEW]Michael D. Beaty - 1990 - Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (2):133-138.
Knowledgeable Belief.J. K. Swindler - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):89-94.
Freedom and Revision.Ira Singer - 2002 - Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):25-44.
Belief Content and Compositionality.Scott Kimbrough - 1997 - Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (1):175-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
19 (#961,136)

6 months
7 (#542,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Candice Shelby
University of Colorado at Denver

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references