Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):547-550 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The recent judgement in the case of Re:M in which the Court held that it would be unlawful to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman in a minimally conscious state raises a number of ethical issues of wide application. Central to these is the extent to which precedent autonomous decisions should be respected in the absence of a legally binding advance decision. Well-being interests can survive the loss of many of the psychological faculties that support personhood. A decision to respect precedent autonomy can contradict the well-being interests of the individual after capacity is lost. These decisions raise difficult questions about personal identity and about the threshold of evidence that is required of an earlier decision in order for it to be respected



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.
Precedent Autonomy: Life-Sustaining Intervention and the Demented Patient.Michael J. Newton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):189-199.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.


Added to PP

46 (#251,573)

6 months
1 (#413,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?