The character and role of principles in the evaluation of art

British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51 (2002)
, George Dickie offers an account of artistic principles comprising both a description of their character and a description of the role they play in the evaluation of artworks. According to the former, artistic principles state that certain individual properties of artworks, in isolation from other properties, are always artistic merits; according to the latter, artistic principles serve as premises from which we infer that artworks have artistic merit. I argue not merely that Dickie 's account fails, but that any account comprising either component of Dickie's account fails. Because not every account of artistic principles need comprise either of Dickie's components, the success of my argument will not rule out every possible account. But it will rule out many, and it will place tight constraints on the rest—tight enough, I believe, to raise worries about whether principles play any role in the evaluation of art.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.1.37
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Fitness Model of Evaluation.Richard A. Richards - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):263–275.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #155,532 of 2,168,640 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,640 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums