Authors
Brendan Shea
Rochester Community And Technical College
Abstract
This is the text of a paper (along with appendixes) delivered at the 2019 annual meeting of the Minnesota Philosophical Society on Oct 26 in Cambridge, MN. Beauchamp and Childress’s “Four Principles” (or “Principlism”) approach to bioethics has become something of a standard not only in bioethics classrooms and journals, but also within medicine itself. In this teaching-focused workshop, I’ll be doing the following: (1) Introducing the basics of the “Four Principles” approach, with a special focus on its relation to the common morality and the importance to weighing and balancing of competing norms. (2) Comparing and contrasting this to other potential approaches, such as those provided by virtue ethics, act utilitarianism, casuistry, and competing versions of principles-based ethics. (3) Considering the ways in which the principles-based approach can best be implemented for lower-level, introductory bioethics classes, where the average student may have little background knowledge in either philosophy or medicine. I’ll be presenting sample activities, case studies, and lesson plans. There will be considerable time reserved for discussion at the end, so that participants can exchange ideas relating to the teaching of both bioethics and other varieties of applied ethics.
Keywords Bioethics  Principlism  Principles of Biomedical Ethics  Ethics Teaching  Medical Ethics  Philosophical Pedagogy  Applied Ethics  Common Morality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Grounds of Moral Status.Julie Tannenbaum & Agnieszka Jaworska - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:0-0.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.
A Critique of Principlism.K. D. Clouser & B. Gert - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):219-236.
Moral Particularism.Jonathan Dancy - 2009 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Really Separates Casuistry From Principlism in Biomedical Ethics.Paul Cudney - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (3):205-229.
Not Just Autonomy--The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics.S. Holm - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):332-338.
The Method of 'Principlism': A Critique of the Critique.B. Andrew Lustig - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):487-510.
In Praise of Unprincipled Ethics.J. Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):303-306.
The Ethics of Science: Its Problems and the Sphere of Research.Ivan T. Frolov - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):235-242.
Specifying Specification.Norbert Paulo - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (1):1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-03

Total views
323 ( #31,661 of 2,497,818 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #20,881 of 2,497,818 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes