The role of diagrams in mathematical arguments

Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):59-74 (2009)
Recent accounts of the role of diagrams in mathematical reasoning take a Platonic line, according to which the proof depends on the similarity between the perceived shape of the diagram and the shape of the abstract object. This approach is unable to explain proofs which share the same diagram in spite of drawing conclusions about different figures. Saccheri’s use of the bi-rectangular isosceles quadrilateral in Euclides Vindicatus provides three such proofs. By forsaking abstract objects it is possible to give a natural explanation of Saccheri’s proofs as well as standard geometric proofs and even number-theoretic proofs.
Keywords Diagram  Proof  Anti-platonism  Mathematical reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-008-9147-6
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Plato: Meno and Phaedo. Plato - 1980 - Cambridge University Press.
Proofs and Pictures.James Robert Brown - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):161-180.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perceiving Necessity.Catherine Legg & James Franklin - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3).
Diagrams and Proofs in Analysis.Jessica Carter - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1 – 14.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
77 ( #70,851 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,465 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature