Authors
James Shelley
Auburn University
Abstract
I defend my reading of Hume's "Of the Standard of Taste" against objections raised by Victor Durà‐Vilà. Two points are central to my defense. One is that Hume takes the joint verdict of true judges to indicate, rather than constitute, the standard of beauty. Two is that Hume requires a joint verdict because individual verdicts need not be expressive of human nature.
Keywords Hume  Aesthetic judgment  Aesthetic objectivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12180
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Papineau and Durà-Vilà.Peter J. Lewis - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):86-89.
Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges.James Shelley - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (2):145-153.
Courage in Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective.V. Dura-Vila - 2014 - British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (1):77-95.
Reply to Putnam and Walsh.Partha Dasgupta - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (3):365-372.
Reply to Ahmed.Lee Walters - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):123-133.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-28

Total views
47 ( #229,293 of 2,454,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,322 of 2,454,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes