In Defense of Artificial Replacement

Bioethics 31 (5):393-399 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If it is within our power to provide a significantly better world for future generations at a comparatively small cost to ourselves, we have a strong moral reason to do so. One way of providing a significantly better world may involve replacing our species with something better. It is plausible that in the not‐too‐distant future, we will be able to create artificially intelligent creatures with whatever physical and psychological traits we choose. Granted this assumption, it is argued that we should engineer our extinction so that our planet's resources can be devoted to making artificial creatures with better lives.

Similar books and articles

Computing machinery and morality.Blay Whitby - 2008 - AI and Society 22 (4):551-563.
Replacement—A Sheffer Stroke for Belief Change.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):127-149.
Should We Replace Disabled Newborn Infants?Dominic Wilkinson - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):390-414.
Deactivating Pacemakers at the End of Life.Benedict M. Guevin - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):39-51.
Is There a Right of National Defense?Thomas Peard - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:341-347.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Gene replacement therapy in the CNS: A view from the retina.Gail M. Seigel - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):69-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-07

Downloads
912 (#14,972)

6 months
301 (#6,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek Shiller
Rethink Priorities