Philosophical Topics 42 (2):289-337 (2014)

Sanford Shieh
Wesleyan University
In this paper I advance an account of the necessity of logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. I reject both the “metaphysical” reading of Peter Hacker, who takes Tractarian logical necessity to consist in the mode of truth of tautologies, and the “resolute” account of Cora Diamond, who argues that all Tractarian talk of necessity is to be thrown away. I urge an alternative conception based on remarks 3.342 and 6.124. Necessity consists in what is not arbitrary, and contingency in what is up to our arbitrary choice, in the symbols we use, in how we picture or model the world. Necessity is not a mode of truth of propositions, but lies in the requirements of their intelligibility. I argue that this conception is implicit in certain “resolute” readings and in some of their critics. Both sides of the dispute are committed to certain logical features of language or thought, patterns of symbolizing constitutive of intelligibility that are not up to us to institute or alter. This conception of non-arbitrary patterns of symbolizing, I argue, is what logical syntax in the Tractatus consists in. I also argue that the well-known Tractarian view of propositions as truth-functions of elementary propositions can be understood in terms of patterns of norms governing our making sense with the affirmation and denial of propositions.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0276-2080
DOI 10.5840/philtopics201442226
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Instructions for Climbing the Ladder.Mauro Luiz Engelmann - 2018 - Philosophical Investigations 41 (4):446-470.
Wittgenstein and What Can Only Be True.Cora Diamond - 2014 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2):9-40.
‘Ultimate’ Facts? Zalabardo on the Metaphysics of Truth.Juliet Floyd - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (3):299-314.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Causal Necessity in Aristotle.Nathanael Stein - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):855-879.
How Many Notions of Necessity?Jordan Stein - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):605-627.
Probability and Logic.Kenny Easwaran - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (12):876-883.
Possible Ideas of Necessity in Indian Logic.Sundar Sarukkai - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (5):563-582.
A Formal Theory of Physical Necessity.Marcin Tkaczyk - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (1):65-83.
Are There Necessary Connections in Nature?Milton Fisk - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):385-404.
Aristotle on Modality and Predicative Necessity.Jean-Louis Hudry - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):5-21.
I—W Hat is the N Ormative R Ole of L Ogic&Quest.Hartry Field - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):251-268.
On the Logic of Viewpoints.Antti Hautamaki - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (1-2):13-14.
Axiomatising the Prior Future in Predicate Logic.Max Cresswell - 2013 - Logica Universalis 7 (1):87-101.


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #268,303 of 2,448,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #58,047 of 2,448,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes