Leibniz, the Young Kant, and Boscovich on the Relationality of Space

In Wenchao Li (ed.), Für Unser Glück Oder Das Glück Anderer, X. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. pp. Vol. 2, pp. 73-85 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz’s main thesis regarding the nature of space is that space is relational. This means that space is not an independent object or existent in itself, but rather a set of relations between objects existing at the same time. The reality of space, therefore, is derived from objects and their relations. For Leibniz and his successors, this view of space was intimately connected with the understanding of the composite nature of material objects. The nature of the relation between space and matter was crucial to the conceptualization of both space and matter. In this paper, I discuss Leibniz’s account of relational space and examine its novel elaborations by two of his successors, namely, the young Immanuel Kant and the Croat natural philosopher Roger Boscovich. Kant’s and Boscovich’s studies of Leibniz’s account lead them to original versions of the relational view of space. Thus, Leibniz’s relational space proved to be a philosophically fruitful notion, as it yielded bold and intriguing attempts to decipher the nature of space and was a key part in innovative scientific ideas.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant On The Ideality Of Space.Kenneth Rogerson - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (June):271-286.
Newton and Leibniz on Non-substantival Space.Alejandro Cassini - 2005 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 20 (1):25-43.
On the space-time ontology of physical theories.Kenneth L. Manders - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-590.
Kant's critique of the Leibnizian philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but pro Leibniz.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 41-63 (and 214-223 notes).
Reflections On Kant’s Concept Of Space.Lisa Shabel - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):45-57.
Leibniz and Newton on Space.Ori Belkind - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-03

Downloads
356 (#59,004)

6 months
65 (#77,613)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Idan Shimony
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Newtonian-Wolffian Controversy: 1740-1759.Ronald S. Calinger - 1969 - Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (3):319.

Add more references