Mou Zongsan on Confucian Autonomy and Subjectivity: From Transcendental Philosophy to Transcendent Metaphysics

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (2):275-287 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Mou Zongsan 牟宗三 contends that Confucianism is an ethics of autonomy. It is maintained that Mou’s version of ethics of autonomy differs from Kant’s in that Mou comprehends subjectivity differently than Kant in such a way that he, unlike Kant, locates the ethical a priori in moral feelings instead of reason. This paper will explore Mou’s metaphysical grounding of morality to show that Kant’s notions of autonomy and subjectivity undergo more radical modifications in Mou’s contention



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mou Zongsan’s view of interpreting Confucianism by “moral autonomy”.Guo Qiyong - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Moral autonomy, civil liberties, and confucianism.Joseph Chan - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
Dao de li xiang zhu yi di chong jian: Mou Zongsan xin ru xue lun zhu ji yao.Zongsan Mou & Jiadong Zheng - 1992 - Beijing: Zhongguo guang bo dian shi chu ban she. Edited by Jiadong Zheng.
Negative autonomy and the intuitions of democracy.Bryce Weber - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):325-346.
Nagel’s Vista or Taking Suhjectivity Seriously.Charles Taliaferro - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):393-401.
Lao Sze-Kwang and Neo-Confucianists.Ming Pingyao - 1999 - Philosophy and Culture 26 (8):712-720.


Added to PP

49 (#333,277)

6 months
14 (#201,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?