Remarks on the Origin of All-Inclusive Pervasion

Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):521-534 (2011)

Previous studies have claimed that the term ‘all-inclusive pervasion’ ( sarvopasaṃhāravyāpti ) appeared for the first time in the Hetubindu , and that it was Dharmakīrti who created this theory. This article attempts to modify this view and to show that the prototype of this theory can already be found in Dignāga’s system of logic. Dignāga states in the third chapter of the Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti that the co-existence of a logical reason with what is to be proved is understood by means of two types of exemplification that sum up external items ( bāhyārthopasaṃhṛta ). Furthermore, with respect to where the pervasion is indicated, he states in the second chapter of the same work that the non-deviation of a logical mark from what is to be proved is indicated elsewhere ( anyatra ). He also implies that anyatra means in the substratum in general ( ādhārasāmānya ) and that the subject is implicitly included in other substrata, i.e., in the substratum in general. Building upon Dignāga’s awareness of the issue, the conflict between the universality of pervasion and the particularity of actual inference, Dharmakīrti reinforced Dignāga’s system of logic by demonstrating that a property to be proved as the universal is not particularised by the subject by the use of the idea of ‘the exclusion of nonconnection’ ( ayogavyavaccheda ) and by adopting the concept of ‘all’ in place of ‘external items’
Keywords Dignāga  Dharmakīrti   Pramāṇasamuccaya   Hetubindu   Pramāṇavārttikasvavṛtti   sarvopasaṃhāravyāpti   bāhyārthopasaṃhṛta   dṛṣṭānta   ādhārasāmānya   ayogavyavaccheda
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9133-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,148
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Deductive, Inductive, Both or Neither?Mark Siderits - 2003 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 (1/3):303-321.
The Role of the Example in Classical Indian Logic.Shoryu Katsura & Ernst Steinkellner - 2004 - Arbeitskreis Für Tibetische Und Buddhistische Studien.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Awareness and Mental Perception.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245.
The Definition of Pervasion (Vyāpti) in Navya-Nyāya II.A. K. Mukherjea - 1979 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 7 (2):107-152.
The Definition of Pervasion (Vyāpti) in Navya-Nyāya.A. K. Mukherjea - 1976 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 4 (1-2):1-50.
Kumārila’s Buddhist.John Taber - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):279-296.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #481,631 of 2,285,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #841,072 of 2,285,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature