British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):412-418 (1998)

Authors
David Shier
Washington State University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.4.412
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ugliness Is in the Gut of the Beholder.Ryan P. Doran - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
The Deformity-Related Conception of Ugliness.Panos Paris - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2):139-160.
A Kantian Analytic of the Ugly.Christopher Buckman - 2017 - International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (4):365-380.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Was There so Much Ugly Art in the Twentieth Century?David E. W. Fenner - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 39 (2):13-26.
How Kant Might Explain Ugliness.Sean McConnell - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):205-228.
Kant and Swinburne on Revelation.Kelli S. O’Brien - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):535-557.
Kant's Ethics of War and Peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?Christian Wenzel - 1999 - British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (4):416-422.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
99 ( #112,151 of 2,462,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,367 of 2,462,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes