Cosmos and History 7 (2):70-93 (2011)

There is a growing realization of the need to promote a constructive dialogue between science and religion both in the scientific and the religious community. Accommodationism based on the concept of nonoverlapping magisteria is arguably the dominant trend in the effort to achieve this goal. Yet despite the fact that accommodationism has many supporters, it has so far failed to promote a productive engagement between science and religion. The article argues that such engagement requires a critical re-examination of the principal tenets, self-evident truths, and intuitions by both the scientific and the religious community. It further argues that despite isolated efforts seeking to promote such re-examination in both domains, neither the scientific nor the religious establishment shows much willingness to pursue this course. Rather they prefer to follow a conservative agenda and impose limits on reason that are designed to protect the status quo
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.John G. Cramer - 1986 - Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Nonoverlapping Magisteria.Stephen Jay Gould - 1997 - Natural History 106 (2):16--22.
Religion, Science, and Culture: Learning From Langdon B. Gilkey.Catherine M. Punsalan-Manlimos - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (1):15-32.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Limits of Reason and Limits of Faith. Hermeneutical Considerations on Evolution Theology.Frank Peter Bestebreurtje - 2013 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 55 (2):243-257.
Kierkegaard and the Limits of Reason: Can There Be a Responsible Fideism?C. Stephen Evans - 2008 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (2/4):1021 - 1035.
Limits of Thought and Husserl's Phenomenology.Brian Redekopp - 2011 - Dissertation, McGill University
Bioethics and the Limits of Tolerance.P. Singer & H. Kuhse - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2):129-145.
Robert Boyle and the Limits of Reason.Jan W. Wojcik - 1997 - Cambridge University Press.
Are There More Than Minimal a Priori Limits on Irrationality?John I. Biro & Kirk A. Ludwig - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):89-102.
The Limits o F Gendered Reason.Kurt Mosser - 1999 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 57 (1):237-273.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #717,056 of 2,462,458 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,458 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes