Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2):133-156 (1994)
Following the recommendations of the US National Academy of Sciences and the mandates of the 1987 Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act, the US Department of Energy has proposed Yucca Mountain, Nevada as the site of the world's first permanent repository for high-level nuclear waste. The main justification for permanent disposal (as opposed to above-ground storage) is that it guarantees safety by means of waste isolation. This essay argues, however, that considerations of equity (safer for whom?) undercut the safety rationale. The article surveys some prima facie arguments for equity in the distribution of radwaste risks and then evaluates four objections that are based, respectively, on practicality, compensation for risks, scepticism about duties to future generations, and the uranium criterion. The conclusion is that, at least under existing regulations and policies, permanent waste disposal is highly questionable, in part, because it fails to distribute risk equitably or to compensate, in full, for this inequity.
|Keywords||compensation equity future generations nuclear waste policy risk Yucca Mountain|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethical Dilemmas and Radioactive Waste: A Survey of the Issues.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):327-343.
Citations of this work BETA
The Morally Desirable Option for Nuclear Power Production.Behnam Taebi - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):169-192.
Similar books and articles
Environmental Risk and the Iron Triangle: The Case of Yucca Mountain.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (4):753-777.
Scientific and Social Judgments of Safety in the Nuclear Fuel Waste Management and Disposal Concept.Mary Richardson - 2000 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 19 (1):33-46.
Mortgaging the Future: Dumping Ethics with Nuclear Waste.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):518-520.
An Uncomfortable Responsibility: Ethics and Nuclear Waste.Mats Andren - 2012 - The European Legacy 17 (1):71 - 82.
Authors and Publication Practices.Michael JG Farthing - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):41-52.
Ethical Theory Versus Unethical Practice: Radiation Protection and Future Generations.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1998 - Ethics and the Environment 3 (2):177 - 195.
Questioning Nuclear Waste Substitution: A Case Study.Alan Marshall - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):83-98.
Nuclear Waste, Secrecy and the Mass Media.Len Ackland, Karen Dorn Steele & JoAnn M. Valenti - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):181-190.
An Egalitarian Response to Utilitarian Analysis of Long-Lived Pollution: The Case of High-Level Radioactive Waste.Constantine Hadjilambrinos - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (1):43-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #138,448 of 2,164,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,012 of 2,164,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?