Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions for informed consent

NanoEthics 1 (1):47-56 (2007)
Abstract
While their strength, electrical, optical, or magnetic properties are expected to contribute a trillion dollars in global commerce before 2015, nanomaterials also appear to pose threats to human health and safety. Nanotoxicology is the study of these threats. Do nanomaterial benefits exceed their risks? Should all nanomaterials be regulated? Currently nanotoxicologists cannot help answer these questions because too little is known about nanomaterials, because their properties differ from those of bulk materials having the same chemical composition, and because they differ so widely in their applications. Instead, this paper answers a preliminary ethical question: What nanotech policies are likely to contribute to society’s ability to give or withhold free informed consent to the potential risks associated with production and use of nanomaterials? This paper argues that at least four current policies appear to jeopardize the risk-disclosure condition that is required for informed consent. These are the funding problem, the conflict-of-interest problem, the labeling problem, and the extrapolation problem. Apart from future decisions on how to ethically make, use, and regulate nanomaterials, this paper argues that, at a minimum, these four policies must be modified. Government must spend greater monies on nanotoxicology; ensure independent nanotoxicology research; label consumer products containing nanomaterials; and avoid assuming that nanotoxicological properties are based merely on mass and chemical composition. Otherwise free informed consent to these new technologies and materials may be jeopardized.
Keywords Benefit  Conflict of interest  Consent  Disclosure  Extrapolation  Funding  Health  Labeling  Nanotoxicology  Policy  Risk  Regulation  Safety
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-007-0003-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Risk and Rationality.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1991 - University of California Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
30 ( #194,734 of 2,231,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,149 of 2,231,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature