Authors
Adam Shriver
Oxford University
Abstract
Many ethicists writing about well-being have assumed that claims made about the relationship between pleasure and well-being carry similar implications for the relationship between pain and well-being. I argue that the current neuroscience of pleasure and pain does not support this assumption. In particular, I argue that the experiences of pleasure and pain are mediated by different cognitive systems, that they make different contributions to human behavior in general and to well-being in particular, and that they bear fundamentally different relationships to our motivational systems and hence desires. I further argue that though there is ample evidence that pleasure can be dissociated from appetitive motivation, there is no compelling evidence suggesting that the unpleasantness of pain can be dissociated from the aversive motivational force of pains. I consider several objections to this claim, including Jennifer Corns’ recent arguments that the unpleasantness of pain experience can be dissociated from the motivational signal of pain, before briefly drawing some lessons for ethics
Keywords pain  pleasure  well-being  ill-being  flourishing  suffering
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13164-013-0171-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics.L. W. Sumner - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Thoemmes Press.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 1863 - Cleveland: Cambridge University Press.
The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire.Chris Heathwood - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):23-44.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rethinking the Negativity Bias.Jennifer Corns - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):607-625.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Pleasure, Desire and Oppositeness.Justin Klocksiem - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (2):1-7.
The Asymmetrical Contributions of Pleasure and Pain to Animal Welfare.Adam J. Shriver - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):152-162.
Why People Prefer Pleasure to Pain.Irwin Goldstein - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (July):349-362.
The Benefits of Pain.Siri Leknes & Brock Bastian - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):57-70.
Pleasure and Pain: Unconditional Intrinsic Values.Irwin Goldstein - 1989 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (December):255-276.
Pain, Pleasure, and the Mind.Yitzchak M. Binik - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):440-441.
Pain and Pleasure.Paul Weiss - 1942 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3 (December):137-144.
An Analysis of Pleasure Vis-a-Vis Pain.Murat Aydede - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):537-570.
Pain and Masochism.Irwin Goldstein - 1983 - Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (3):219-223.
Pain Detection and the Privacy of Subjective Experience.Adam J. Kolber - 2007 - American Journal of Law & Medicine 33 (2&3):433-456.
The Penumbral Theory of Masochistic Pleasure.Colin Klein - 2014 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (1):41-55.
The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire.Chris Heathwood - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):23-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-12

Total views
55 ( #171,760 of 2,343,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #332,401 of 2,343,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes