Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):139-154 (2002)
Blue-collar workers throughout the world generally face higher levels of pollution than the public and are unable to control many health risks that employers impose on them. Economists tend to justify these risky workplaces on the grounds of the compensating wage differential (CWD). The CWD, or hazard-pay premium, is the alleged increment in wages, all things being equal, that workers in hazardous environments receive. According to this theory, employees trade safety for money on the job market, even though they realize some of them will bear the health consequences of their employment in a risky occupational environment. To determine whether the CWD or hazard-pay premium succeeds in justifying alleged environmental injustices in the workplace, this essay (1) surveys the general theory behind the “compensating wage differential”; (2) presents and evaluates the “welfare argument” for the CWD; (3) offers several reasons for rejecting the CWD, as a proposed rationale for allowing apparent environmental injustice in the workplace; and (4) applies the welfare argument to an empirical case, that of US nuclear workers. The essay concludes that this argument fails to provide a justification for the apparent environmental injustice faced by the 600,000 US workers who have labored in government nuclear-weapons plants and laboratories.
|Keywords||compensating wage differential (CWD) occupational ethics nuclear workers ionizing radiation nuclear weapons hazard pay environmental injustice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethical Dilemmas and Radioactive Waste: A Survey of the Issues.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):327-343.
Citations of this work BETA
Evaluating the Source of the Risks Associated with Natural Events.Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (2):125-140.
Similar books and articles
Veterans' Welfare, the GI Bill and American Demobilization.Laura McEnaney - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (1):41-47.
Mortgaging the Future: Dumping Ethics with Nuclear Waste.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):518-520.
Children's Labor Market Involvement, Household Work, and Welfare: A Brazilian Case Study. [REVIEW]J. Lawrence French - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):63-78.
Flexible Outsourcing and the Impacts of Labour Taxation in European Welfare States.Erkki Koskela & Panu Poutvaara - unknown
Risky Business: Nuclear Workers, Ethics, and the Market-Efficiency Argument.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 2002 - Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):1-23.
Risky Businessnuclear Workers, Ethics, and the Market-Efficiency Argument.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2002 - Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):1-23.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #210,540 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,741 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?