Educational Theory 63 (3):299-316 (2013)

Contemporary educational reformers have claimed that research on social class differences in child raising justifies programs that aim to lift children out of poverty by means of cultural interventions. Focusing on the Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP), Ruby Payne's “aha! Process,” and the Harlem Children's Zone as examples, Amy Shuffelton argues that such programs, besides overstepping the social science research, are ethically illegitimate insofar as they undermine the equitable development of civic agency. Shuffelton invokes Aristotelian civic friendship, particularly as interpreted by Danielle Allen and Sibyl Schwarzenbach, as key to a politics that avoids relations of domination and subordination. She concludes that social justice requires that educators involved with culturally interventionist programs recognize the workings of power within schooling and society, that they accept the limits of their own perspectives, and that they remain open to what is of value in child-raising practices other than those associated with the contemporary middle class
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/edth.12025
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,935
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

'New Fatherhood' and the Politics of Dependency.Amy Shuffelton - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (2):216-230.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #467,747 of 2,403,163 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,711 of 2,403,163 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes