Emotion Review 2 (2):137-138 (2010)
Abstract |
In the target article, we reviewed empirical evidence regarding the relationship between facial expressions and emotion in infancy. In our response to commentators, we make three main points. First, we concur with Hertenstein that the field has thus far relied too heavily on deductive reasoning, and suggest that future research strike a balance between inductive and deductive reasoning. Second, we maintain that infant recognition of discrete emotions remains an open question. Third, we state our position regarding the revised version of DET
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/1754073909355011 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Extending Emotion Science to the Study of Discrete Emotions in Infants.Carroll E. Izard, Elizabeth M. Woodburn & Kristy J. Finlon - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):134-136.
Discrete Emotions in Infancy: Perception Without Production?Stefanie Hoehl & Tricia Striano - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):132-133.
Cautions in the Study of Infant Emotional Displays.Matthew J. Hertenstein - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (2):130-131.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-02
Total views
22 ( #512,997 of 2,506,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,408 )
2013-11-02
Total views
22 ( #512,997 of 2,506,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads