Early meanings of dependent-origination

Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (2):297-317 (2008)
Dependent-origination, possibly the most fundamental Buddhist philosophical principle, is generally understood as a description of all that exists. Mental as well as physical phenomena are believed to come into being only in relation to, and conditioned by, other phenomena. This paper argues that such an understanding of pratītya-samutpāda is mistaken with regard to the earlier meanings of the concept. Rather than relating to all that exists, dependent-origination related originally only to processes of mental conditioning. It was an analysis of the self, not of reality, embedded in the Upaniṣadic search for the ātman. The teaching also possessed important ontological implications regarding the nature of the relation between consciousness and reality. These implications suggest that rather than things being conditioned by other things, they are actually conditioned by consciousness.
Keywords Dependent-origination   pratītya-samutpāda   paṭiccasamuppāda  Early Buddhism  Conditionality  Causality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-007-9030-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Dependent Origination-the Indo-Tibetan Tradition.Alex Wayman - 1980 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (4):275-300.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

63 ( #79,391 of 2,146,309 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,104 of 2,146,309 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums