Nothing to Know

Idealistic Studies 44 (1):1-29 (2014)

Authors
Martin Shuster
Hamilton College
Abstract
I argue that Theodor W. Adorno is best understood as a moral perfectionist thinker in the stripe of Stanley Cavell. This is significant because Adorno’s moral philosophy has not received serious interest from moral philosophers, and much of this has to do with difficulties in situating his thought. I argue that once Adorno is situated in this way, then, like Cavell, he offers an interesting moral perspective that will be of value to a variety of moral theorists. My argument proceeds in two broad steps: first, I show that Cavell and Adorno share a distinct epistemological orientation, one that centers around the impossibility of knowledge in certain situations, and trades on a Kantian and post-Kantian picture. Second, I show that their moral perfectionism fundamentally rests on such epistemology.
Keywords Theodor Adorno  Stanley Cavell  Moral Epistemology  Immanuel Kant  Moral Perfectionism  Moral Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0046-8541
DOI 10.5840/idstudies20152619
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,836
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-12

Total views
53 ( #156,184 of 2,266,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #98,139 of 2,266,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature