The Commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti’s Prasanna-padā [Book Review]

Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (4):379-417 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper challenges the notion that there is a complete continuity between the thought of Nāgārjuna and the thought of Candrakīrti. It is shown that there is strong reason to doubt Candrakīrti’s gloss of Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā (MMK) 2.1, and that Candrakīrti’s peculiar reading of this verse causes him to alter the context of the discussion in the four cases in which Nāgārjuna quotes MMK 2.1 later in the text—MMK 3.3, 7.14, 10.13 and 16.7. The innovation produced by Candrakīrti is next contrasted to Nāgārjuna’s style of argument, and it is shown that these two author’s notions of emptiness, as well as their particular implementation of Madhyamaka logic, significantly diverge from each other. Finally, Candrakīrti’s reading of these verses is compared with his commentary on MMK 15 so as to suggest a possible subtle metaphysical position that is at the base of his thinking

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mipam’s Middle Way Through Yogācāra and Prāsaṅgika.D. S. Duckworth - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (4):431-439.
Pyrrhonism and the mādhyamaka.Adrian Kuzminski - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):482-511.
On mmk 24.18.Claus Oetke - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (1):1-32.
The notion of svabhāva in the thought of candrakīrti.WilliamL Ames - 1982 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 10 (2):161-177.
Turning a madhyamaka trick: Reply to Huntington. [REVIEW]Jay L. Garfield - 2008 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (4):507-527.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-12

Downloads
62 (#193,506)

6 months
1 (#447,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?