Illusions [Book Review]
Review of Metaphysics 22 (3):575-575 (1969)
Abstract
The Pegram Lectures at Brookhaven National Laboratory are designed to provide a forum to consider the question of the interaction among science, the humanities, and society at large. Just before Maurois was to deliver these lectures in 1967 he became fatally ill. However, the manuscript had been prepared and was delivered by Jacques Barzun. These lectures along with prefatory remarks by Barzun and E. Morot-Sir of the French Embassy comprise Illusions. There are three lectures by Maurois. The first begins by cataloguing various everyday illusions, mostly optical. It discusses dreams, the difference between illusion and hallucination, the role of interpretation of reality in the creation of illusion, and the distinction between who we are as opposed to whom we play. In short it reminds us that, for various reasons, we do not see the world as it is. The second lecture shows how science tries to correct our distorted pictures of reality. Science is largely successful in this effort, says Maurois, although inasmuch as men need to interpret what science discovers, the door is still open for illusion. Moreover, inasmuch as scientists are men, science is not above producing some illusions of its own. The third and perhaps the most contrived lecture explores the world of willful illusions: the fine arts. Here Maurois suggests some differences and similarities between art and science, and explores the technological interaction between the two. He concludes that illusion will always be with us and that in fact it is "the stuff of which our life is made."-S. O. H.ISBN(s)
0034-6632
My notes
Similar books and articles
Susceptibility to optical illusions: specific or general?M. A. Tinker - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):593.
Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2011 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):58-67.
The illusions of scientists vs. the illusions of social epistemologists.E. C. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Positive Illusions, Perceived Control and the Free Will Debate.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Tatyana Matveeva - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (5):495-522.
The awareness of illusions.Elena Pasquinelli - 2012 - In Clotilde Calabi (ed.), Perceptual Illusions: Philosophical and Psychological Essays.
Perceiving the Present: Systematization of Illusions or Illusion of Systematization?Robert E. Briscoe - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (8):1530-1542.
Towards a Synchretist Theory of Depiction (How to Account for the Illusionistic Aspect of Pictorial Mirrors, Illusions and Epistemic Innocence).Roberto Casati - 2012 - In Clotilde Calabi (ed.), Perceptual Illusions: Philosophical and Psychological Essays.
Positive illusions and positive collusions: How social life abets self-enhancing beliefs.Jonathon D. Brown - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):514 - 515.
Cross-modal illusions and perceptual content: Lessons from cross-modal illusions.Casey O'Callaghan - 2006 - Electroneurobiolog 14 (2):211-224.
“Can do” attitudes: Some positive illusions are not misbeliefs.Owen Flanagan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):519 - 520.
Seeing what you hear: Cross-modal illusions and perception.Casey O'Callaghan - 2008 - Philosophical Issues 18 (1):316-338.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
22 (#522,476)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
2012-03-18
Downloads
22 (#522,476)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Gone in a flash: manipulation of audiovisual temporal integration using transcranial magnetic stimulation.Roy H. Hamilton, Martin Wiener, Daniel E. Drebing & H. Branch Coslett - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.