Philosophical Topics 35 (1/2):83-113 (2007)

Authors
Alan Sidelle
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Abstract
The idea that disputes which are heated, and apparently important, may nonetheless be 'merely verbal' or 'just semantic' is surely no stranger to any philosopher. I urge that many disputes, both in and out of philosophy, are indeed plausibly considered verbal, and that it would repay us to more frequently consider whether they are so or not. Asking this question is what I call ‘The Method of Verbal Dispute’. Neither the notion nor the method of verbal dispute is new. What I do here is to urge its wider application, to suggest how widespread is the phenomenon of verbal disputes, and to clarify certain misconceptions about what is, or needs to be, involved in a verbal dispute. One central claim is that verbal disputes need not be ‘merely’ verbal disputes – that often, there is a real disagreement to be had, but it is not the one suggested by the surface form of the disagreement. I also discuss the relation between verbal disputes, relativism and cases in which ‘there is no fact of the matter’
Keywords verbal disputes   metaontology   relativism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0276-2080
DOI 10.5840/philtopics2007351/25
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conceptual Fragmentation and the Rise of Eliminativism.Henry Taylor & Peter Vickers - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):17-40.
Disagreement Lost.Martín Abreu Zavaleta - 2020 - Synthese (1-2):1-34.
Two Species of Merely Verbal Disputes.Delia Belleri - 2018 - Metaphilosophy 49 (5):691-710.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Verbal Disputes.David Chalmers - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566.
Is the Hirsch–Sider Dispute Merely Verbal?Gerald Marsh - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):459-469.
Merely Verbal Disputes.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):11-30.
Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.Karen Bennett - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 38.
Physical-Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes, and Common Sense.Eli Hirsch - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):67–97.
Spory rzeczowe i słowne.Anna Brożek - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).
The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon.R. Brown & David N. McNeill - 1966 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5:325-37.
Inductive Judgments About Natural Categories.Lawrence J. Rips - 1975 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:665-681.
Whewell and Mill on Induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Non-Verbal Responses to Verbal Stimuli.P. H. Esser - 1956 - Synthese 10 (1):246 - 258.
Pictorial Metaphor.Sun-ah Kang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:121-127.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-02-21

Total views
320 ( #29,176 of 2,454,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #42,406 of 2,454,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes