The Method of Verbal Dispute

Philosophical Topics 35 (1/2):83-113 (2007)
Abstract
The idea that disputes which are heated, and apparently important, may nonetheless be 'merely verbal' or 'just semantic' is surely no stranger to any philosopher. I urge that many disputes, both in and out of philosophy, are indeed plausibly considered verbal, and that it would repay us to more frequently consider whether they are so or not. Asking this question is what I call ‘The Method of Verbal Dispute’. Neither the notion nor the method of verbal dispute is new. What I do here is to urge its wider application, to suggest how widespread is the phenomenon of verbal disputes, and to clarify certain misconceptions about what is, or needs to be, involved in a verbal dispute. One central claim is that verbal disputes need not be ‘merely’ verbal disputes – that often, there is a real disagreement to be had, but it is not the one suggested by the surface form of the disagreement. I also discuss the relation between verbal disputes, relativism and cases in which ‘there is no fact of the matter’
Keywords verbal disputes   metaontology   relativism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philtopics2007351/25
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,613
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conceptual Fragmentation and the Rise of Eliminativism.Henry Taylor & Peter Vickers - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):17-40.
Disagreement, Error, and an Alternative to Reference Magnetism.Timothy Sundell - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):743 - 759.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Verbal Disputes.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566.
Is the Hirsch-Sider Dispute Merely Verbal?Gerald Marsh - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):459-469.
Merely Verbal Disputes.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (1):11-30.
Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.Karen Bennett - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 38.
Physical-Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes, and Common Sense.Eli Hirsch - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):67–97.
Spory rzeczowe i słowne.Anna Brożek - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).
Endurance, Perdurance, and Metaontology.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy (2):159-177.
The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon.R. Brown & David N. McNeill - 1966 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5:325-37.
Inductive Judgments About Natural Categories.Lawrence J. Rips - 1975 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:665-681.
Whewell and Mill on Induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Non-Verbal Responses to Verbal Stimuli.P. H. Esser - 1955 - Synthese 10 (1):246 - 258.
Pictorial Metaphor.Sun-Ah Kang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:121-127.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-21

Total downloads

210 ( #18,790 of 2,168,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #21,578 of 2,168,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums