Dangerous dualisms or murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison

Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (4):577–595 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jim Garrison’s recent criticisms of what he refers to as ‘dangerous dualisms’ in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison’s systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey’s terminology and philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foucault, Dewey, and Self‐creation.Jim Garrison - 1998 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 30 (2):111–134.
Summing up our differences: A reply to Siegel.Jim Garrison - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (2):229–232.
Dewey, Hegel, and causation.Jim Good Jim Garrison - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):101-120.
Philosophy as education.Jim Garrison - 2006 - In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis (eds.), Educational Theory. Blackwell. pp. 391-406.
Being a whole person.Jim Garrison & S. B. Schneider - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (7):766–769.
Editorial Comment.Jim Garrison - 2000 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 19 (3):223-223.
Editor's Comment.Jim Garrison - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (4):283-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#310,395)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references