If we could talk to the animals

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):146-147 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis of discontinuity between humans and nonhumans requires evidence from formal reasoning tasks that rules out solutions based on associative strategies. However, insightful problem solving can be often credited through talking to humans, but not to nonhumans. We note the paradox of assuming that reasoning is orthogonal to language and enculturation while employing the criterion of using language to compare what humans and nonhumans know

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can we be too uncertain about uncertainty responses?Lori Marino - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):348-349.
Humans, nonhumans and personhood.Robert W. Mitchell - 1993 - In Peter Singer & Paola Cavalieri (eds.), The Great Ape Project. St. Martin's Griffin. pp. 237--247.
Automata, receptacles, and selves.Paola Cavalieri & Harlan B. Miller - 1999 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 5.
A collective of humans and nonhumans.Bruno Latour - 2010 - In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and values: essential readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Not for Humans Only. The Place of Nonhumans in Environmental Ethics.P. Singer - forthcoming - Environmental Ethics. An Anthology.
Animal emotion.Beth Dixon - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):22-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#245,994)

6 months
15 (#185,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations