- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Must thinking be critical to be critical thinking? Reply to Finocchiaro
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (4):453-461 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Critical thinking and thinking critically: Response to Siegel.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (4):462-466.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
22 (#669,532)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
2009-01-28
Downloads
22 (#669,532)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Philosophy in the (Gender and the Law) Classroom.Laura D'Olimpio - 2017 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 38 (1):1-16.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-9lpj8 uwo