Phenomenological Laws and Mechanistic Explanations

Philosophy of Science 91 (1):132-150 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In light of recent criticisms by Woodward (2017) and Rescorla (2018), we examine the relationship between mechanistic explanation and phenomenological laws. We disambiguate several uses of the phrase “phenomenological law” and show how a mechanistic theory of explanation sorts them into those that are and are not explanatory. We also distinguish the problem of phenomenological laws from arguments about the explanatory power of purely phenomenal models, showing that Woodward and Rescorla conflate these problems. Finally, we argue that the temptation to pit mechanistic and interventionist theories of explanation against one another occludes important and scientifically relevant research questions.

Similar books and articles

Extended Mechanistic Explanations: Expanding the Current Mechanistic Conception to Include More Complex Biological Systems.Sarah M. Roe & Bert Baumgaertner - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):517-534.
II—James Woodward: Mechanistic Explanation: Its Scope and Limits.James Woodward - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):39-65.
The Completeness of Mechanistic Explanations.Tudor M. Baetu - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):775-786.
Integrating Mechanisms and Laws in Psychopathology Research.Panagiotis Oulis - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 59:15-20.
Mechanistic explanation in engineering science.Dingmar van Eck - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):349-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-16

Downloads
520 (#35,844)

6 months
197 (#14,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Carl F. Craver
Washington University in St. Louis
Gabriel Siegel
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations