Cognitive Science 42 (S3):692-727 (2018)

Abstract
From a theoretical perspective, most discussions of statistical learning have focused on the possible “statistical” properties that are the object of learning. Much less attention has been given to defining what “learning” is in the context of “statistical learning.” One major difficulty is that SL research has been monitoring participants’ performance in laboratory settings with a strikingly narrow set of tasks, where learning is typically assessed offline, through a set of two-alternative-forced-choice questions, which follow a brief visual or auditory familiarization stream. Is that all there is to characterizing SL abilities? Here we adopt a novel perspective for investigating the processing of regularities in the visual modality. By tracking online performance in a self-paced SL paradigm, we focus on the trajectory of learning. In a set of three experiments we show that this paradigm provides a reliable and valid signature of SL performance, and it offers important insights for understanding how statistical regularities are perceived and assimilated in the visual modality. This demonstrates the promise of integrating different operational measures to our theory of SL.
Keywords Individual differences  Learning dynamics  Online measures  Statistical learning
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12556
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Finding Structure in Time.Jeffrey L. Elman - 1990 - Cognitive Science 14 (2):179-211.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Falsificationism and Statistical Learning Theory: Comparing the Popper and Vapnik-Chervonenkis Dimensions.David Corfield, Bernhard Schölkopf & Vladimir Vapnik - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):51-58.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-07

Total views
31 ( #351,520 of 2,449,096 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,096 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes