Replies to Nagel, Pautz, and Railton_2018 Eastern APA

Abstract

This handout contains my replies to comments on the Rationality of Perception by Jennifer Nagel, Adam Pautz, and Peter Railton from a symposium at the 2018 Eastern APA in Savannah.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Replies to Wang, Speaks, and Pautz.Trenton Merricks - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):487-505.
When is cognitive penetration a plausible explanation?Valtteri Arstila - 2018 - Consciousness and Cognition 59:78-86.
Cognitive Penetrability of Perception.Dustin Stokes - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (7):646-663.
Perception.Adam Pautz - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Cognitive penetration of early vision in face perception.Ariel S. Cecchi - 2018 - Consciousness and Cognition 63:254-266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-21

Downloads
167 (#77,024)

6 months
28 (#43,890)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanna Siegel
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references