Revising the Principle of Alternate Possibilities

Stance 6 (1):15-20 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the position in moral philosophy that Harry Frankfurt calls the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP). The paper first describes the principle as articulated by A.J. Ayer. Subsequently, the paper examines Frankfurt’s critique and proposed revision of the principle and argues that Frankfurt’s proposal relies on an excessively simplistic account of practical reasoning, which fails to account for the possibility of moral dilemmas. In response, the paper offers a further revision of PAP, which accounts for Frankfurt’s critique, moral dilemmas, and the challenge of causal determinism.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-02

Downloads
558 (#17,790)

6 months
63 (#20,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Siegel
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829.

Add more references