Theoria 15 (38):263-280 (2000)
The standard argument against the compositionality of adjective-noun compounds containing "red" says that "red" does not make the same semantic contribution because a red car has to be red outside whereas a red watermelon has to be red inside. Fodor's reply to that argument is that the inside/outside feature is semantically irrelevant because "red F" just means F which is red for Fs. That account agrees with our intuitions concerning analyticity; but it seems to be in conflict with a central test for understanding: a person who knows nothing else about these expressions than what is offered by Fodor is far from applying them successfully
|Keywords||Adjective Competence Compositionality Language Meaning Noun Semantics Fodor, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Connectionism, Constituency and the Language of Thought.Paul Smolensky - 1991 - In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Compositionality and Context.Peter Pagin - 2005 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 303-348.
Two Spurious Varieties of Compositionality.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):159-72.
Why Compositionality Won't Go Away: Reflections on Horwich's 'Deflationary' Theory.Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore - 2001 - Ratio 14 (4):350–368.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #68,966 of 2,169,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #49,578 of 2,169,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?