Transforming Thinking: Can Mach’s Pedagogy Be Replicated?

In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence. Springer Verlag. pp. 571-600 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his obituary on Mach, Einstein, asked, “It is difficult – and perhaps also not very important – to answer the question: “What has Mach taught, which was principally new relative to Bacon and Hume?” Mach’s teaching had such an influence on people like Einstein that it fundamentally changed their way of thinking. Is this effect reproducible, and if so, how? For answering this question, one needs to research into the historical-genetic origins of Mach’s erkenntnis-theory and its difference to other erkenntnis-theories, namely Platonism and Pythagoreanism. Mach’s empirical-genetic erkenntnis-theory is the only one consistent with the requirements of evolutionary theory, especially regarding psychology and pedagogy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John T. Blackmore: Two Recent Trilogies on Ernst Mach.Hayo Siemsen - 2011 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 15:311-321.
Looking for Routes in Mach’s Epistemology.Isabel Serra & Elisa Maia - 2018 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 (1):173-196.
Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations.Erik C. Banks - 2001 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37 (4):327-348.
The reception of Ernst Mach in the school of Brentano.Denis Fisette - 2018 - Hungarian Philosophical Review 69 (4):34-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-14

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references