What is the question concerning the rationality of science?

Philosophy of Science 52 (4):517-537 (1985)
Abstract
The traditional views of science as the possessor of a special method, and as the epitome or apex of rationality, have come under severe challenges for a variety of historical, psychological, sociological, political, and philosophical reasons. As a result, many philosophers are either denying science its claim to rationality, or else casting about for a new account of its rationality. In this paper a defense of the traditional view is offered. It is argued that contemporary philosophical discussion regarding the rationality of science is plagued by a failure to distinguish among three different questions, all taken to be "the" question of the rationality of science. Once these questions are delineated, it becomes possible to answer one of them in such a way that the traditional link between science's rationality and its method is reestablished--although the scientific method is itself given a non-traditional rendering. In short, it is argued that there is a feature of science which is appropriately characterized as its method; that this method does in fact secure science's rationality; and that science is therefore correctly construed as preeminently rational. It is suggested in addition that the philosophy of science is itself best seen as a primarily epistemological activity, and consequently that a correction from the excessively historicist conception of recent philosophy of science is in order
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289273
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,220
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Laudan's Normative Naturalism.Harvey Siegel - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):295-313.
Scientific Rationality as Instrumental Rationality.Ronald N. Giere - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (3):377-384.
Neither Humean nor (Fully) Kantian Be: Reply to Cuypers.Harvey Siegel - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3):535–547.
Farewell to Feyerabend.Harvey Siegel - 1989 - Inquiry 32 (3):343 – 369.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Why Science Cannot Be Value-Free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.
William Whewell: Problems of Induction Vs. Problems of Rationality.John Wettersten - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):716-742.
Rationality and Anemia (Response to Baigrie).Harvey Siegel - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):442-447.
Consensus and Evolution in Science.Gonzalo Munevar - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:120 - 129.
Siegel on the Rationality of Science.Brian S. Baigrie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-441.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

208 ( #18,970 of 2,164,867 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,012 of 2,164,867 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums