Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (2):353-371 (2022)

Katrina L. Sifferd
Elmhurst College
Tyler Fagan
Elmhurst College
In this paper we attempt to reply to the thoughtful comments made on our book, Responsible Brains, by a stellar group of scholars. Our reply focuses on two topics discussed in the commenting papers: first, the issue of responsibility for negligent behavior; and second, the broad claim that facts about brain function are normatively inert. In response to worries that our theory lacks normative implications, we will concentrate on an area where our theory has clear relevance to law and legal policy: juvenile responsibility.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-021-09602-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829.
Consciousness and Moral Responsibility.Neil Levy - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Punishment and Responsibility.H. L. A. Hart - 1968 - Philosophy 45 (172):162-162.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Author’s Reply: Negligence and Normative Import.Katrina L. Sifferd & Tyler K. Fagan - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 22 (August):1-19.
Crimes of Negligence: Attempting and Succeeding. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):387-398.
Reply to Critics.Matti Eklund - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (5):535-561.
Nobody’s Perfect: Moral Responsibility in Negligence.Ori Herstein - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 31 (1):109-125.
Reply to Bykvist and Olson.Matti Eklund - 2019 - Utilitas 31 (3):347-349.
Responsibility and the Negligence Standard.Joseph Raz - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18.
The Wrong in Negligence.John Oberdiek - 2021 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 41 (4):1174-1196.
More Attempts: A Reply to Duff, Husak, Mele and Walen. [REVIEW]Gideon Yaffe - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):429-444.
Designation and Truth: A Reply.P. T. Geach - 1949 - Analysis 10 (5):118 - 119.
The Fault of Not Knowing.George Fletcher - 2002 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 3 (2).
The Problem with Negligence.Matt King - 2009 - Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):577-595.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,552,534 of 2,519,278 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,278 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes