Can a Corporation be Worthy of Moral Consideration?

Journal of Business Ethics:1-13 (forthcoming)

Authors
Kenneth Silver
University of Southern California
Abstract
Much has been written about what corporations owe society and whether it is appropriate to hold them responsible. In contrast, little has been written about whether anything is owed to corporations apart from what is owed to their members. And when this question has been addressed, the answer has always been that corporations are not worthy of any distinct moral consideration. This is even claimed by proponents of corporate agency. In this paper, I argue that proponents of corporate agency should recognize corporations as worthy of moral consideration. Though particular views of moral status are often taken for granted in the literature, corporations can satisfy many views of moral status given the capacities often ascribed to them. They can even meet the conditions of the views assumed. I conclude by suggesting that recognizing the moral status of corporations may not be as drastic or harmful as we might imagine.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3787-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,736
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer & Peter Singer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
Responsibility Incorporated.Philip Pettit - 2007 - Ethics 117 (2):171-201.
On Action.Carl Ginet, Kathleen Lennon & Carlos J. Moya - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):498-500.
The Free Will of Corporations.Kendy M. Hess - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):241-260.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Does the Machine Need a Ghost? Corporate Agents as Nonconscious Kantian Moral Agents.Kendy M. Hess - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (1):67-86.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Moral Responsibility.Amy J. Sepinwall - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (1):3-13.
Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?David T. Ozar - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):277 - 281.
Corporations, Rights, and Lobbying.Quentin Gee - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):397-408.
How Autonomy Alone Debunks Corporate Moral Agency.David Rönnegard - 2013 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 32 (1-2):77-107.
Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood.Rita C. Manning - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
Corporations and Non‐Agential Moral Responsibility.James Dempsey - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (4):334-350.
Corporations and the Cause of Environmental Protection.Napoleon M. Mabaquiao - 2002 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 12 (1):11-15.
The Free Will of Corporations.Kendy M. Hess - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):241-260.
Differences in Moral Values Between Corporations.Paul C. Nystrom - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):971 - 979.
Corporate Speech as Commercial Speech.Jeffrey Nesteruk - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):97-103.
Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jan Edward Garrett - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):535 - 545.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-01-23

Total views
52 ( #150,205 of 2,243,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #64,326 of 2,243,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature