History of Economic Ideas 24 (3):187-221 (2016)
AbstractThe paper aims to address the following two questions: what kind of discourse is that which attempt to found or defend the autonomy or the boundaries of a discipline? Why do such discourses tend to turn into normative, dogmatic-excommunicating discourses between disciplines, schools or scholars? I will argue that an adequate answer may be found if we conceive disciplines as dogmatics, where such discourses often take the form of a discourse on the foundation of a discipline, a foundation in the name of which the scholar speaks and with which he/she entertains an identity relationship. To this purpose I will re-examine the methodological discourses of (and debates between) Pareto, Croce and Einaudi on the demarcation issue between philosophy, economics and value-judgments as highly instructive to understand such issues.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Boundaries and Borderlines: Reflections on Jean Baudrillard and Critical Theory.Douglas Kellner - unknown
On the (Methodological) Future of Law and Economics. The Uneasy Burden of Value Judgments and Normativity.Paolo Silvestri - 2019 - Global Jurist 19 (3):1-17.
Economics, Humanities and Values.Paolo Silvestri - 2018 - Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science 52 (1):137-145.
Interdisciplinarity and Insularity in the Diffusion of Knowledge: An Analysis of Disciplinary Boundaries Between Philosophy of Science and the Sciences.John McLevey, Alexander V. Graham, Reid McIlroy-Young, Pierson Browne & Kathryn Plaisance - 2018 - Scientometrics 1 (117):331-349.
Persuasion: Reflections on Economics, Data, and the 'Homogeneity Assumption'.Adam Fforde - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):63-91.
The Conflict of the Faculties: Educational Research, Inclusion, Philosophy and Boundary Discourses.Marianna Papastephanou - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (2):99-116.
Division and Difference in the "Discipline" of Economics.Jack Amariglio, Stephen Resnick & Richard Wolff - 1990 - Critical Inquiry 17 (1):108-137.
Review Essay: Prospects for Economic Sociology.Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):133-149.
Rhetoric and Disciplinary Change: A Study of Wittgenstein's "Tractatus" and "Investigations".Arabella Lyon - 1990 - Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments.John Turri, Wesley Buckwalter & David Rose - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):212-222.
Theoretical and Methodological Context of (Post)-Modern Econometrics and Competing Philosophical Discourses for Policy Prescription.Emerson Abraham Jackson - 2018 - Journal of Heterodox Economics 4 (2):119-129.
The Boundaries of Technique: Ordering Positive and Normative Concerns in Economic Research.Andrew Yuengert - 2004 - Lexington Books.
Philosophy of Economics, History Of.Julian Reiss - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, USA: SAGE Publications Ltd.. pp. 701-778.
Borrowed Knowledge: Chaos Theory and the Challenge of Learning Across Disciplines.Stephen H. Kellert - 2008 - University of Chicago Press.