Journal of Business Ethics:1-15 (forthcoming)
AbstractThe ‘limits of markets’ debate broadly concerns the question of when it is (im)permissible to have a market in some good. Markets can be of tremendous benefit to society, but many have felt that certain goods should not be for sale (e.g., sex, kidneys, bombs). Their sale is argued to be corrupting, exploitative, or to express a form of disrespect. In Markets without Limits, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski have recently argued to the contrary: For any good, as long as it is permissible to give it for free, then it is permissible to give it for money. Their thesis has led to a number of engaging objections, and I leverage recent work on the nature of feasibility within political philosophy to offer a new challenge. I argue that feasibility offers a constraint on which markets can be permissibly implemented. Though it may be possible to create a morally acceptable version of an otherwise repugnant market, some of these markets may be infeasible, and so we are not permitted to implement them. After laying out this challenge, I consider several replies. They concern the relevance of feasibility, and whether any markets really are infeasible. This provides an opportunity to explore the dangers of pursuing the infeasible and with markets generally. I conclude by considering what might lead us to pursue these markets despite their infeasibility, or how knowledge of infeasibility may prove useful regardless.
Similar books and articles
Democracy and the Epistemic Limits of Markets.Kevin J. Elliott - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):1-25.
Review of Brennan and Jaworski, Markets Without Limits. [REVIEW]Jonny Anomaly - 2016 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:00.
What Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets.Ken Wright - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):21.
Review of Michael Sandel’s What Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. [REVIEW]Thomas R. Wells - 2014 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):138-149.
Jason F. Brennan and Peter Jaworski, Markets Without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests. Reviewed By.Rodgers Lamont - 2017 - Philosophy in Review 37 (1):8-10.
The Moral Limits of Markets: The Case of Human Kidneys.Debra Satz - 2008 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
Book Review: What Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, by Michael Sandel and Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale, by Deborah SatzWhat Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, by SandelMichael. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale, by SatzDeborah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. [REVIEW]Wendy Brown - 2014 - Political Theory 42 (3):355-363.
Effective Vote Markets and the Tyranny of Wealth.Alfred Archer, Bart Engelen & Viktor Ivanković - 2019 - Res Publica 25 (1):39-54.
Water Rights and Moral Limits to Water Markets.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - In C. Tyler DesRoches, Frank Jankunis & Byron Williston (eds.), Canadian Environmental Philosophy. Montreal & Kingston: pp. 217-233.
Markets Without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests.Jason F. Brennan & Peter Jaworski - 2015 - Routledge.
What Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets.Sandel Michael - 2012 - Macmillan.
Transformable Goods and the Limits of What Money Can Buy.David G. Dick - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (1):121-140.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Ideal Vs. Non‐Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654-664.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):180-187.
Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets.Debra Satz - 2010 - Oxford University Press.