Journal of Business Ethics:1-15 (forthcoming)

Authors
Kenneth Silver
Trinity College, Dublin
Abstract
The ‘limits of markets’ debate broadly concerns the question of when it is (im)permissible to have a market in some good. Markets can be of tremendous benefit to society, but many have felt that certain goods should not be for sale (e.g., sex, kidneys, bombs). Their sale is argued to be corrupting, exploitative, or to express a form of disrespect. In Markets without Limits, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski have recently argued to the contrary: For any good, as long as it is permissible to give it for free, then it is permissible to give it for money. Their thesis has led to a number of engaging objections, and I leverage recent work on the nature of feasibility within political philosophy to offer a new challenge. I argue that feasibility offers a constraint on which markets can be permissibly implemented. Though it may be possible to create a morally acceptable version of an otherwise repugnant market, some of these markets may be infeasible, and so we are not permitted to implement them. After laying out this challenge, I consider several replies. They concern the relevance of feasibility, and whether any markets really are infeasible. This provides an opportunity to explore the dangers of pursuing the infeasible and with markets generally. I conclude by considering what might lead us to pursue these markets despite their infeasibility, or how knowledge of infeasibility may prove useful regardless.
Keywords limits of markets  moral limits of markets  feasibility  risk
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-021-04948-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Ideal Vs. Non‐Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654-664.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):180-187.
Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):67-94.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democracy and the Epistemic Limits of Markets.Kevin J. Elliott - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):1-25.
Semiotic Limits to Markets Defended.David Rondel - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-16.
What Money Can’T Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets.Ken Wright - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):21.
Markets with Some Limits.Mark Wells - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (4):611-618.
The Moral Limits of Markets: The Case of Human Kidneys.Debra Satz - 2008 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
Water Rights and Moral Limits to Water Markets.C. Tyler DesRoches - 2019 - In C. Tyler DesRoches, Frank Jankunis & Byron Williston (eds.), Canadian Environmental Philosophy. Montreal & Kingston: pp. 217-233.
Triumph und Grenzen des Marktes.Jens Beckert - 1998 - Analyse & Kritik 20 (2):205-220.
Transformable Goods and the Limits of What Money Can Buy.David G. Dick - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (1):121-140.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-07

Total views
48 ( #224,518 of 2,455,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #16,440 of 2,455,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes