Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):197 - 236 (1974)

Abstract
MORAL THEORY is by no means unique in its dependence upon judgment for its application. Judgment is a creative faculty that stands as the active link between any theory and its application, whether it be a theory of science, morality, or aesthetics.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph1974282165
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant on Virtue.Claus Dierksmeier - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4):597-609.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Feasible Aesthetic Formalism.Nick Zangwill - 1999 - Noûs 33 (4):610-629.
Reason Alone Cannot Identify Moral Laws.Noriaki Iwasa - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):67-85.
Kant and Ethical Formalism.Robert W. Hall - 1960 - Kant-Studien 52 (1-4):433-439.
Kant's Aesthetic Revolution.Albert Hofstadter - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
32 ( #342,197 of 2,454,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes