Rule-following as coordination: a game-theoretic approach

Synthese 190 (5):871-890 (2013)
Abstract
Famously, Kripke has argued that the central portion of the Philosophical Investigations describes both a skeptical paradox and its skeptical solution. Solving the paradox involves the element of the community, which determines correctness conditions for rule-following behavior. What do such conditions precisely consist of? Is it accurate to say that there is no fact to the matter of rule following? How are the correctness conditions sustained in the community? My answers to these questions revolve around the idea that a rule is followed insofar as a convention is in place. In particular, I consider the game-theoretic definition of convention offered by David Lewis and I show that it illuminates essential aspects of the communitarian understanding of rule-following. Make the following experiment: say “It’s cold here” and mean “It’s warm here”. Can you do it?Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 1953, §510.I can’t say “it’s cold here” and mean “it’s warm here”—at least, not without a little help from my friends.David Lewis, Convention
Keywords Coordination  Rule-following  Convention  Wittgenstein  David Lewis  Common knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0190-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Lewis - 1969 - Harvard University Press.
Evolution of the Social Contract.Brian Skyrms - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Zettel.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1967 - Blackwell.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation.Paul Piwek - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
Explaining Quantity Implicatures.Robert Rooij & Tikitu Jager - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (4):461-477.
Game Theory and Conventiont.Neil Tennant - 2001 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
On the Narrow Epistemology of Game Theoretic Agents.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer.
Distinctive Human Social Motivations in a Game-Theoretic Framework.Don Ross - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):715-716.
Game Theory Andconvention.Margaret Gilbert - 1981 - Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Dynamic Inconsistency and Choice.Isabelle Brocas - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (3):343-364.
Playing the Rule-Following Game.Julia Tanney - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (292):203-224.
Coordination and Cooperation.Maarten C. W. Janssen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
How to Lewis a Kripke-Hintikka.Alessandro Torza - 2013 - Synthese 190 (4):743-779.
Added to PP index
2012-12-04

Total downloads
68 ( #78,765 of 2,180,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,822 of 2,180,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums