Relativity without tears

Abstract

Special relativity is no longer a new revolutionary theory but a firmly established cornerstone of modern physics. The teaching of special relativity, however, still follows its presentation as it unfolded historically, trying to convince the audience of this teaching that Newtonian physics is natural but incorrect and special relativity is its paradoxical but correct amendment. I argue in this article in favor of logical instead of historical trend in teaching of relativity and that special relativity is neither paradoxical nor correct (in the absolute sense of the nineteenth century) but the most natural and expected description of the real space-time around us valid for all practical purposes. This last circumstance constitutes a profound mystery of modern physics better known as the cosmological constant problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Special relativity.Albert Shadowitz - 1968 - Philadelphia,: Saunders Co..
Relativity and common sense.Hermann Bondi - 1964 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor books.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
A sophisticate's primer of relativity.P. W. Bridgman - 1962 - London,: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Edited by Adolf Grünbaum.
Special relativity.A. P. French - 1968 - New York,: Norton.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#190,239)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?