Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148 (2011)

Abstract
Indoor smoking bans in public places is usually held as a simple and straightforward example of the application of the harm principle in public health. However, implementing indoor smoking bans in mental health centres is difficult because of the potential neurological and social benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia, as suggested by some empirical studies. In this article, the ethical challenges related to smoking bans in mental health centres as justified by the harm principle are explored. Particular attention is given to the case of R v. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust . The article concludes by arguing that the possible benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia creates a rightful interest that cannot be ignored even if one applies the harm principle to protect others from the negative effects of second-hand smoke. Applying the harm principle in the case of smoking bans in mental health centres requires protecting the interest of persons with schizophrenia to smoke via the value of reciprocity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/phr021
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Beyond the Harm Principle.Arthur Ripstein - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (3):215-245.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Principle-Based Method of Practical Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2017 - Health Care Analysis 25 (3):275-289.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Smoking Policies.Judy C. Nixon & Judy F. West - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):409 - 414.
The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism?Martin J. Lecker - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (S1):47 - 64.
The Harm Principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Smoking and Social Justice.Kristin Voigt - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):91-106.
Free to Smoke.Walter E. Block - 2010 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1-4):135-153.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Let the Patients Smoke: A Defence of a Patient Privilege.M. Lavin - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):136-140.
The Harm Principle and Genetically Modified Food.Nils Holtug - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):168-178.
Cut the Fat! Defending Trans Fats Bans.Nathan Nobis & Molly Gardner - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):39 - 40.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-06

Total views
65 ( #162,937 of 2,444,859 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,859 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes