Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148 (2011)
Indoor smoking bans in public places is usually held as a simple and straightforward example of the application of the harm principle in public health. However, implementing indoor smoking bans in mental health centres is difficult because of the potential neurological and social benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia, as suggested by some empirical studies. In this article, the ethical challenges related to smoking bans in mental health centres as justified by the harm principle are explored. Particular attention is given to the case of R v. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust . The article concludes by arguing that the possible benefits of smoking for persons with schizophrenia creates a rightful interest that cannot be ignored even if one applies the harm principle to protect others from the negative effects of second-hand smoke. Applying the harm principle in the case of smoking bans in mental health centres requires protecting the interest of persons with schizophrenia to smoke via the value of reciprocity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Principle-Based Method of Practical Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - forthcoming - Health Care Analysis:1-15.
Similar books and articles
The Ethics of Smoking Policies.Judy C. Nixon & Judy F. West - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):409 - 414.
The Smoking Penalty: Distributive Justice or Smokism? [REVIEW]Martin J. Lecker - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):47 - 64.
Smoking in Public: A Moral Imperative for the Most Toxic of Environmental Wastes.David M. Ludington - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (1):23 - 27.
Examining Tobacco Control Strategies and Aims Through a Social Justice Lens: An Application of Sen's Capability Approach.E. Breton & W. Sherlaw - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):149-159.
The Ethical and Economic Implications of Smoking in Enclosed Public Facilities: A Resolution of Conflicting Rights. [REVIEW]S. Andrew Ostapski, L. Wayne Plumly & J. L. Love - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):377-384.
Ethics, Prevention, and Public Health.Angus Dawson & Marcel Verweij (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Is Prevention Better Than Cure? A Re-Evaluation of the Potential Use of Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Children.K. McMahon-Parkes - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):121-128.
Let the Patients Smoke: A Defence of a Patient Privilege.M. Lavin - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):136-140.
The Harm Principle and Genetically Modified Food.Nils Holtug - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):168-178.
Cut the Fat! Defending Trans Fats Bans.Nathan Nobis & Molly Gardner - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):39 - 40.
Can It Be Ethical to Apply Limited Resources in Low-Income Countries to Ineffective, Low-Reach Smoking Cessation Strategies? A Reply to Bitton and Eyal.S. Chapman & R. Mackenzie - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):29-37.
Added to index2011-07-06
Total downloads27 ( #180,040 of 2,051,011 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #396,194 of 2,051,011 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.