Social Philosophy Today 20:129-136 (2004)

Even if war, terrorism, and other acts of political violence are inherently wrong, in so radically imperfect a world as our own there remains a need, as Virginia Held suggests, to evaluate such acts so as to distinguish between degrees of their unjustifiability. This essay proposes a notion of deliberative democracy as one criterion for such a comparative evaluation. Expanding on an analysis of the psychologically terrorizing impact of violence borrowed from Hannah Arendt, I suggest that it is principally this that makes for the special wrongness of terrorism, though that by itself does not show that it is never necessary.An effort to distinguish clearly the superiority of states over non-state actors in this regard proves futile, so I conclude that there is no automatic legitimacy to be gained by either sort. It follows that we should weigh an act of political violence on its own demerits irrespective of whether it is done by a state or by a group in opposition to states, and further that we should resist the propagandistic labeling of non-state violence as “evil” or “terroristic,” where such terms beg the question of its relative merits, in context, vis-à-vis state violence.
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1543-4044
DOI socphiltoday20042015
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Weighing Evils.Matthew R. Silliman - 2004 - Social Philosophy Today 20:129-136.
The Media and Political Violence.Virginia Held - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (2):187-202.
The Paradox of Terrorism in Civil War.Stathis N. Kalyvas - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (1):97-138.
Précis of How Terrorism is Wrong.Virginia Held - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (3):187-188.
On Justifying Violence.Kai Nielsen - 1981 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):21 – 57.
On Politics and Violence: Arendt Contra Fanon.Elizabeth Frazer & Kimberly Hutchings - 2008 - Contemporary Political Theory 7 (1):90-108.
Violence, Oppresssion.David T. Risser - 1999 - In Christopher B. Gray (ed.), The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia (vol. 2). Garland Publishing, Inc.:893-895.
Terrorism and War.Virginia Held - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (1):59-75.
The Concept of Violence in the Work of Hannah Arendt.Annabel Herzog - 2017 - Continental Philosophy Review 50 (2):165-179.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #760,717 of 2,333,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #587,885 of 2,333,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes