Environmental Ethics 29 (3):267-278 (2007)
In her book, Moral Status, Mary Anne Warren defends a comprehensive theory of the moral status of various entities. Under this theory, she argues that animals may have some moral rights but that their rights are much weaker in strength than the rights of humans, who have rights in the fullest, strongest sense. Subsequently, Warren believes that our duties to animals are far weaker than our duties to other humans. This weakness is especially evident from the fact that Warren believes that it is frequently permissible for humans to kill animals for food. Warren’s argument for her view consists primarily in the belief that we have inevitable practical conflicts with animals that make it impossible to grant them equal rights without sacrificing basic human interests. However, her arguments fail to justify her conclusions. In particular, Warren fails to justify her beliefs that animals do not have an equal right to life and that it is permissible for humans to kill animals for food.
|Keywords||moral status animals animal rights weak rights mary anne warren|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation: Do Animals Have Rights?Tom L. Beauchamp - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things.Mary Anne Warren - 1997 - Clarendon Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #79,005 of 2,164,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #44,159 of 2,164,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?