California's Proposition 69: A Dangerous Precedent for Criminal DNA Databases

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):199-213 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On November 2, 2004, California voters elected to radically expand their state criminal DNA database through the passage of Proposition 69. The approved ballot initiative authorized DNA collection and retention from all felons, any individuals with past felony convictions – including juveniles – and, beginning in 2009, all adults arrested for any felony offense. This dramatic database expansion threatens civil liberties and establishes a dangerous precedent for U.S. criminal databases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation.M. Guillen - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):266-271.
Political Shirking – Proposition 13 vs. Proposition 8.Seiji Fujii - 2009 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 10 (2):213-237.
Dangerous games and the criminal law.Daniel B. Yeager - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1):3-12.
Symposium on Preventive Justice Preface.Antony Duff - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):499-500.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Terrorizing Criminal Law.Lucia Zedner - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):99-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
13 (#903,303)

6 months
1 (#1,087,801)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references