Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66 (2012)

Authors
Aaron Simmons
Marywood University
Abstract
Are embryos deserving of moral consideration in our actions? A standard view suggests that embryos are considerable only if they have interests. One argument for embryonic interests contends that embryos are harmed by death because they are deprived of valuable future lives as adult persons. Some have challenged this argument on the grounds that embryos aren’t identical to adults: either due to the potential for embryos to twin or because we do not exist until the fetus develops consciousness. These arguments fail to show that embryos do not have future adult lives. There is a better reason to think that embryos cannot have interests; namely, because they are not capable of having desires. Others have held this view but have not sufficiently justified it. The justification lies in the fact that the capacity for desires is necessary to make sense of the normativity of interests.
Keywords embryos  interests  harm  consciousness  identity  twinning
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9336-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Human Identity and Bioethics.David DeGrazia - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Why Abortion is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life.Frances Kamm - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):273-280.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Eugenic Selection Benefits Embryos.Mark Walker - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (5):214-224.
The Embryo Rescue Case.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes?Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
Resolving Disputes Over Frozen Embryos: A New Proposal.Jeremy Williams - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):172-185.
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Discarded Embryo Argument.Mark Moller - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
Killing Embryos for Stem Cell Research.Jeff Mcmahan - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):170–189.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-21

Total views
200 ( #49,262 of 2,432,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #36,274 of 2,432,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes