Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 1 (82):33-56 (2020)

Massimiliano Simons
University of Ghent
The central claim of this article is that post-truth requires a political and socio-economical perspective, rather than a moral or epistemological one. The article consists of two parts. The first part offers a critical examination of the dominant analyses of post-truth in terms of shifting standards of the origin and the evaluation of facts. Moreover, the claim that postmodernism is the cause of post-truth is examined and refuted. In the second part an alternative perspective is developed, centring around the notion of gatekeepers. Rather than linking post-truth to bullshit and postmodernism, it should be understood as a symptom of a contemporary shift in the gatekeepers of truth and knowledge. Knowledge and truth are always mediated in society through the hands of gatekeeping institutions such as journalism or science. Post-truth is a symptom of a broader transformation of the gatekeeping institutions of our current society. It therefore requires a political philosophy of these institutional shifts and the new risks they involve.
Keywords Post-truth  Surveillance capitalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Stop Talking About Fake News!Josh Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10):1033-1065.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Truth, Lies and Tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth.Vittorio Bufacchi - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (3):347-361.
Lima Tesis tentang Politik Pasca Kebenaran (Five Theses on Post-Truth Politics).Zainul Maarif - 2019 - Prosiding Simposium FIlsafat: Politik Dan Anti Politik 2019:1-13.
What to Do with Post-Truth.Lorna Finlayson - 2019 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 8:63-79.
Democracy and Inquiry in the Post-Truth Era: A Pragmatist Solution.Daniel Labrador Montero - 2020 - Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 9 (13).
Foxes V. Lions. [REVIEW]Steve Baxi - 2019 - History of Human Sciences 1.
On the Erosion of Democracy by Truth.Bradford Vivian - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (4):416-440.
Post-Truth as a Procrastination of Enlightenment.Jens Lemanski - 2018 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 11 (1):117-127.
Post-Truth, Fear and Control Information: What Role for Law?Gianluigi Fioriglio - 2019 - Governare la Paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies:105-105.
Introduction: ‘Post-Truth’?Rupert Read & Timur Uçan - 2019 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 8:5-22.
Stop Talking About Fake News!Josh Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10):1033-1065.


Added to PP index

Total views
306 ( #34,405 of 2,505,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #14,725 of 2,505,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes