Authors
Peter Simpson
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
Arguments for and against liberalism are vitiated by failing to distinguish between states (which have millions of citizens) and communities (which have only a few thousand citizens). The state should be liberal or minimal, but the community should not. The state is an alliance of communities for mutual defense and is concerned with matters of defense alone. Two reasons are given for this conclusion, one from Aristotle and one from Hobbes (though Hobbes's argument has to be corrected in two important respects). The community, by contrast, is a moral community and should not be liberal. Two arguments are also given for this conclusion, one from the naturalness of the family and one from the need for moral education. Once state and community have been thus distinguished and described, standard arguments both for and against the liberal state are seen to be correct but misdirected.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913819408443332
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Society as a Department Store.Ryszard Legutko - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (3):327-343.
The Free Market in a Republic.Ryszard Legutko - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1):37-52.
Shopping‐Mall Liberalism: Rejoinder to Narveson.Ryszard Legutko - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (1):135-137.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Economic Consequentialism and Beyond.Jeffrey Friedman - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (4):493-502.
Libertarianism Vs. Community: Reply to Simpson.Ryszard Legutko - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):421-425.
The Politics of Communitarianism.Jeffrey Friedman - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (2):297-340.
Community in a New Libertarianism: Rejoinder to Legutko.Peter Simpson - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):427-429.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance?Colin M. Macleod - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Libertarianism Vs. Community: Reply to Simpson.Ryszard Legutko - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (3):421-425.
Liberalism and Fear of Violence.Bruce Buchan - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):27-48.
Taxation, the State, and the Community.Jeffrey Schoenblum - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):210-234.
Respect for Persons and Perfectionist Politics.Thaddeus Metz - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (4):417–442.
Thinking Community and the State From Within.Antonio Calcagno - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):31-45.
Locke's Militant Liberalism: A Reply to Carl Schmitt's State of Exception.Vicente Medina - 2002 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (4):345 - 365.
Privilege or Recognition? The Myth of State Neutrality.Tim Nieguth - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):112-131.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-18

Total views
33 ( #316,127 of 2,421,638 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #545,272 of 2,421,638 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes