Mereology and truth-making

Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (3):245-258 (2016)
Authors
Peter Simons
Trinity College, Dublin
Abstract
Many mereological propositions are true contingently, so we are entitled to ask why they are true. One frequently given type of answer to such questions evokes truth-makers, that is, entities in virtue of whose existence the propositions in question are true. However, even without endorsing the extreme view that all contingent propositions have truth-makers, it turns out to be puzzlingly hard to provide intuitively convincing candidate truth-makers for even a core class of basic mereological propositions. Part of the problem is that the relation of part to whole is ontologically intimate in a way reminiscent of identity. Such intimacy bespeaks a formal or internal relation, which typically requires no truth-makers beyond its terms. But truth-makers are held to necessitate their truths, so whence the contingency when A is part of B but need not be, or B need not have A as part? This paper addresses and attempts to disentangle the conundrum.
Keywords mereology   mereological propositions   truth-makers   continuants
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.12775/LLP.2015.020
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,445
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Truthmakers.Fraser MacBride - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Truth­-Makers.Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons & Barry Smith - 2009 - Swiss Philosophical Preprints.
Pieces of Mereology.Andrzej Pietruszczak - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):211-234.
Postscript to Why Truthmakers.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2008 - In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-making. Acumen Publishing.
Truth-Makers and Convention T.Jan Woleński - 2011 - Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
Zašto 2+2=4?: Why 2+2=4?Boran Bercic - 2005 - Il Pensiero 25 (4):945-961.
Truth and Collective Truth.Gilbert Plumer - 1996 - Dialectica 50 (1):3-24.
Zašto 2+2=4?Boran Berčić - 2005 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 25 (4):945-961.
Mereology and Location.Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Mereology and Modality.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2014 - In Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford University Press. pp. 33-56.
An Ontological Argument for Modal Realism.Michael Losonsky - 1988 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 31:165-177.
The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth.Susan Haack - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):20-35.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-06

Total downloads
3 ( #840,548 of 2,285,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #231,437 of 2,285,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature